We noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Objectives
- Power-Hays and McGann
- Evidence: Funding for SCD
- SCD and mortality in the US
- Case JP
- Sickle Cell Anemia (SCA)
- Hemoglobin: A molecule to breath
- Hydrophobic pocket for 6β Val
- Intracellular polymer content
- Two consequences of polymerization: Vaso-occlusion
- Cellular adhesion
- Dactylitis
- Second consequence of polymerization: Free hemoglobin
- NO: Role in vascular homeostasis
- Epidemiology of SCD pain
- Epidemiology of SCD pain: Daily diary
- Case presentation
- Diagnosing a painful crises
- The pain of SCD
- Pain perceptions
- Evidence base for the treatment of VOC
- ESCAPED study
- ESCAPED results
- Treating acute SCD pain
- Case
- Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS)
- ACS: A vicious cycle
- ACS: Causes
- ACS: Prospective study
- Risk factors for progression to mechanical ventilation
- NHLBI guideline recommendations for ACS
- Patient case
- Current medicine cabinet
- Hemoglobin production
- Effects of HbF in SS disease
- Multicenter study of hydroxyurea (HU)
- HU benefits not limited to HbF induction
- Probability of 10-year overall survival in SCD HU vs. no HU
- Common mistakes with HU
- L-glutamine (1)
- L-glutamine: Result of phase III trial
- L-glutamine (2)
- Crizanlizumab (1)
- Crizanlizumab: Phase 2 trial
- Crizanlizumab (2)
- Crizanlizumab: Phase 3 trial
- Possible limitations of STAND
- Voxelotor
- Change in hemoglobin level from baseline to week 24
- Voxelotor voluntarily pulled off market by Pfizer
- My plan for these therapies
- JP: Hydroxyurea
- The difficult patient
- Difficult patient: Neuropsychological dysfunction
- Prevalence of silent cerebral infarcts in SCD
- Cognitive impairment: Guideline recommendations
- Screening MRI
- Curative/transformative therapies
- Gene therapy: Lovotibeglogene autotemcel (Lyfgenia)
- Lyfgenia: Results
- Changes in the rate of VOE
- Gene therapy: Exagamglogene autotemcel (Casgevy)
- Casgevy: Results and outcomes
- Risks of gene therapy
- Barriers to transformative therapies
- Conclusion
- Financial disclosures
Topics Covered
- Sickle cell disease (SCD)
- Describe the pathophysiology of vaso-occlusive (VOE) events in SCD
- The pain of sickle cell disease
- Acute chest syndrome
- Apply guideline-based care to adults with SCD
- Preparing for gene therapy
Links
Categories:
Therapeutic Areas:
External Links
- Slide 25: Evidence-Based Management of Sickle Cell Disease: Expert Panel Report, 2014
- slide 32: Evidence-Based Management of Sickle Cell Disease: Expert Panel Report, 2014
- Slide 51: EMA starts review of sickle cell disease medicine Oxbryta
- Slide 5: Where are we now with Sickle Cell Disease
- Slide 68: Transformative SCD Center Recommendations
Talk Citation
Lanzkron, S. (2025, September 30). Comprehensive sickle cell care in the era of gene therapy [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.69645/MEWH4887.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
- Published on September 30, 2025
Financial Disclosures
- Consulting: novo Nordisk, Bluebird bio, Pfizer, Glycomimetics, Novartis, Agios, Merck Research funding: Agios, HRSA, PCORI Stock – Pfizer and teva in a family trust.
A selection of talks on Haematology
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
I'm Dr. Sophie Lanzkron,
I am a Professor of Medicine,
and the director of
the division of
Classical Hematology at
the Sidney Kimmel
Medical College at
Thomas Jefferson University.
Today, I'm going to talk about
a comprehensive overview of
sickle cell disease in
the era of gene therapy.
0:21
I'm going to describe
the pathophysiology of
vaso-oclusive events in
sickle cell disease.
Apply some
guideline-based care to
adults with sickle cell disease,
and talk a little bit, at
the end, about gene therapy—
the promise of gene therapy and
the risks associated
with gene therapy.
0:38
I like to start my
talks with this quote.
This is from the New England
Journal of Medicine,
from our colleagues
Power-Hays and McGann.
"There may be no population of
patients whose health
care and outcomes are
more effected by racism than
those with sickle cell disease."
I think that's really true,
and I think that there is data
that supports that this is true.
0:60
On this slide, we did
a study comparing both
NIH (National Institutes of
Health) federal funding for
research for sickle
cell disease and
foundation funding for
sickle cell disease,
and compared that same
funding to cystic fibrosis.
You look, there are about
90 to 100,000 people in
the United States with
sickle cell disease and about
30,000 with cystic fibrosis.
You look at the amount of
NIH funding for both
of these diseases:
about $76 million for
sickle cell disease and
$84 million for cystic fibrosis,
which doesn't sound like
it's terribly different.
But when you think about
the funding per person with the
disease living in the United States,
it's quite remarkable.
They is about $812
per person spent for
research on people with
sickle cell disease,
and almost $3000 per person for
people with cystic fibrosis.
That disparity looks
more stark when
you look at foundation funding.
The Cystic Fibrosis
Foundation has about
$230 million to spend each year,
and the Sickle Cell
Disease Association and
other foundations raise
about $10 million each year.
That equates to about
$102 for people with
sickle cell disease,
and almost $8000 per person for
people with cystic fibrosis.
To think that these
differences in
federal funding for research and
foundation funding for resources
don't make a difference,
I think is unrealistic.
We know that research dollars,
especially federal ones
really make a difference in
the development
of new therapies,
which we desperately need for
people with sickle cell disease.
Foundation funding
can be used for
many things to
support patients who
often live and struggle with
social determinants of health,
providing transportation
to doctors' appointments,
and, additionally,
many other services,
including community
health workers.
Even for the Cystic
Fibrosis Foundation,
they have funded fellows
in pulmonary to become
cystic fibrosis experts.
We know that in
sickle cell disease,
there really aren't enough
experts in the disease,
so this funding disparity
makes a huge difference.