We noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Overview
- Background and molecular classification in EC
- Endometrial cancer
- Treatment for recurrent/metastatic EC
- Risk stratification in early-stage
- Risk stratification in early-stage disease
- Risk stratification- molecular classification
- Categorising “double classifiers”
- Other considerations regarding the importance of biomarker testing
- Biomarker testing in the era of molecular classifications: Focus on dMMR
- MLH1 promotor hypermethylation and Lynch testing
- Risk stratification
- Molecular classification as prognostic marker
- Molecular classification as a prognostic marker for EC
- Prognostic classification of EC using NGS panel
- ProMisE molecular classifier
- ProMisE outcomes
- Molecular-based classification of EC
- Prognostic value of molecular classification
- L1CAM expression in high-risk EC
- Molecular classification as prognostic marker and implications
- Molecular classification as predictive marker
- PORTEC 3
- PORTEC 3 – molecular markers
- RUBY trial
- RUBY – outcomes
- KEYNOTE-868/ NRG-GY018
- KEYNOTE-868 - PFS
- DUO-E trial
- DUO-E trial –dMMR
- pMMR biomarker-known subpopulation
- pMMR subpopulation: CP + durvalumab vs. CP
- pMMR subpopulation: CP + durvalumab + Olaparib vs. CP
- Phase 3 randomised, double-blind study
- Immunotherapy in dMMR patients: Evidence from the adjuvant setting
- Hormonal therapy
- Prognostic impact of molecular classification in fertility-sparing treatment
- Molecular classification predicts radiotherapy response
- GOG-258 outcomes according to ProMiSE
- Molecular classification as predictive marker & treatment response
- Integrating molecular classification into clinical practice
- Essential clinical requirements
- British Association of Gynaecological Pathologists guidance on POLE testing
- ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for patients with EC
- 2023 FIGO staging of cancer of the endometrium (1)
- Future pathways
- 2023 FIGO staging of cancer of the endometrium (2)
- RAINBO trial
- Potential future pathway – IO single agent
- DOMENICA trial
- Future treatment pathways
- Thank you and financial disclosures
Topics Covered
- Background and molecular classification in endometrial cancer
- Molecular classification as prognostic marker
- Molecular classification as predictive marker for treatment response
- Integrating molecular classification into clinical practice
- Future pathways
Links
Series:
Categories:
Therapeutic Areas:
Talk Citation
Eminowicz, G. (2025, October 30). Endometrial cancer: integrating molecular insights into personalized care [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved November 9, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.69645/XEPR2964.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
- Published on October 30, 2025
Financial Disclosures
- Dr. Gemma Eminowicz has not informed HSTalks of any commercial/financial relationship that it is appropriate to disclose.
Other Talks in the Series: Periodic Reports: Advances in Clinical Interventions and Research Platforms
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
My name is Dr. Gemma Eminowicz.
I'm a consultant
clinical oncologist at
University College London
Hospital in the UK,
treating gynecological cancers.
I'm going to talk about
endometrial cancer and
integrating molecular insights
into personalized care.
0:17
As an overview, I'm going to
talk about the background,
molecular classification
in endometrial cancer,
and then talk specifically about
molecular classification
as a prognostic marker,
as a predictive marker
for treatment response,
and how to integrate that
into clinical practice.
Then I'll briefly touch on
potential future pathways.
0:37
Background and molecular
classification
in endometrial cancer.
0:42
Endometrial cancer is rising
in incidence and mortality.
We know that approximately
three-quarters of the patients,
so the majority of patients,
do present with stage
I or II disease.
This is early-stage disease and
has an excellent prognosis.
However, there are patients
who have high intermediate risk,
when they have
high-grade disease or
deep myoinvasion or
substantial lymphovascular
space invasion,
and they still have a
15-25% recurrence rate.
High-risk patients, however,
who have very high-grade
disease or stage III disease
can have a 40-60% recurrence
rate at five years.
We know that relapsed
and late-stage disease
only have a five-year
survival rate of about 17%.
1:25
Talking about the
treatment for recurrent
or metastatic
endometrial cancer,
the options have been very
limited until recently.
The first-line
treatment has been
carboplatin and
paclitaxel for many years
and this provides a
progression-free survival
of about 13 months and
an overall survival of
just over three years.
We have used endocrine
therapy with
response rates of up to
55% have been reported.
When patients are
ER/PR positive,
Tamoxifen or Megace
have been used
and also more recently,
aromatase inhibitors.
Second-line chemotherapy,
however, only has
an overall response rate
of between 0 and 27%.
If patients have
localised disease,
then we do consider
surgery or chemoradiation.
Recently, there's
been an evolution of
immunotherapy and biomarker-directed
systemic therapy.
But outcomes are still
poor in those who recur.
Therefore, reducing the risk in
the earlier stage of the
disease is very important.
Risk stratification in
early stage disease
Hide