Registration for a live webinar on 'Neuroleptic malignant syndrome' is now open.
See webinar detailsWe noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Randomized trials in cancer medicine
- Randomized trials - achievements
- So, what is wrong here?
- Randomized trials - disadvantages
- Problems with overall survival as study end point
- Progression free survival vs. overall survival
- Progression free vs. overall survival - example
- Issues with existing cancer clinical trials paradigm
- Ongoing paradigm-change in cancer management
- Impact on cancer trials
- Are there advantages in joining a randomized trial?
- The future of individual molecular testing
- Proposed alternatives to randomized trials
- Example: population-based study
- ‘N-of-1’ research paradigm
- Questionable conclusions of trials paradigm
- EGFR is not a relevant target in ovarian cancer
- HER-2 expression is not relevant in ovarian cancer
- “Molecular matching” impacts clinical outcomes
- “Molecular matching” - clinical evidence
- Matched vs. unmatched patients example
- Phase 2 “basket trials”
- Conclusion
Topics Covered
- Randomized cancer clinical trials paradigm problems
- Novel paradigm changes in cancer management
- “Molecular matching” and “basket trials” advantages in malignant clinical trials
Links
Series:
Categories:
Therapeutic Areas:
Talk Citation
Markman, M. (2017, October 31). Clinical research and care in the era of ‘N-of-1’ precision cancer medicine [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved October 12, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.69645/ANJT6329.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
Financial Disclosures
- Prof. Maurie Markman has not informed HSTalks of any commercial/financial relationship that it is appropriate to disclose.
Other Talks in the Series: Cancer Therapies in the Personalized Medicine Era
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hello, I'm Dr. Maurie Markman,
President of Medicine and Science
Cancer Treatment Centers of America,
and also a Clinical Professor of Medicine,
Drexel University, College of Medicine in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The title of my lecture is
Clinical Research and Care in the Era of 'N-of-1' Precision Cancer Medicine.
What I'm going to be doing in this lecture is really
discussing what I believe are the requirements for
a new paradigm in the evaluation of new anti-neoplastics in cancer management,
and I hope that you will find this to be quite enjoyable.
0:39
It is impossible to downgrade the role that
randomized trials have played in
the establishment of the standard-of-care in cancer medicine.
Today, all our standard treatment approaches are
based upon this well-established paradigm.
This includes the efficacy/toxicity of the established modalities of surgery, radiation,
and neoplastic drug delivery,
and in the case of anti-neoplastics,
this includes cytotoxic, 'targeted' and immunotherapeutic agents.
Further randomized trials have been the cornerstone of
the development of multi-modality approaches to cancer management.
And finally, it is important to note that it is the randomized trials that
historically have really helped end practices that quite frankly were harmful.
They were based solely on physician belief,
their own experience, rather than objective clinical evidence,
and there's no more powerful example of this than
the experience with the radical mastectomies for early breast cancer,
which characterized the management of this disease based upon
the unfortunate, mistaken belief that
somehow you could just take more and more of the breast,
and more and more of the chest wall,
and somehow remove all of the breast cancer.
It took phase III randomized trials,
conducted a number of decades ago to demonstrate, unequivocally,
that not only was this aggressive surgery not helpful,
but it was obviously harmful to the individual patient.
And again, it was the randomized trials that demonstrated the role and
the establishment of a less aggressive surgery and then obviously,
subsequently, with the use of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy.
Hide