Registration for a live webinar on 'Precision medicine treatment for anticancer drug resistance' is now open.
See webinar detailsWe noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
- Scope of the Problem
-
1. Current thinking in back pain management - introduction
- Ms. Anna Hlavsova MSc, MCSP, HPC
-
2. Genetic epidemiology of low back pain and intervertebral disc degeneration
- Dr. Frances Williams
- Biomechanics, Spinal Surgery and Research Methods
-
3. The biomechanics of back pain: what we know so far
- Prof. Michael Adams
-
4. Low back pain: a composite of interacting systems?
- Prof. Alison McGregor
-
5. What does physiotherapy teach us about back pain?
- Ms. Josephine O'Callaghan
-
6. How we currently measure back pain
- Prof. Rob Froud
-
7. Back pain: are we measuring the right things?
- Prof. Rob Froud
- Chronic Pain and Current Challenges
-
8. The psychosocial flags framework: overcoming obstacles to work
- Prof. Kim Burton
- Current Therapies and Treatments
-
9. Psychological treatment for people with musculoskeletal pain 1
- Prof. Tamar Pincus
-
10. Psychological treatment for people with musculoskeletal pain 2
- Prof. Tamar Pincus
-
11. Current thinking in pain medicine and some thoughts on back pain
- Dr. Nick Hacking
-
12. Combined physical and psychological programmes plus alternative therapies for back pain
- Ms. Anna Hlavsova MSc, MCSP, HPC
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Content
- Psychological processes associated with LBP
- Disengagement from life: the outcome measured
- Risk factors identified by systematic reviews
- What is depression in the context of pain?
- Take home message (1)
- Illness perception
- Take home message (2)
- Fear avoidance
- Some limitations
- Take home message (3)
- Effective reassurance
- Pooling the effects from psychological predictors
- Psychological interventions for people with LBP
- Practical constraints (or a commonly held myth)
- Interventions should include psychology
- How much psychology was delivered in trials
- The story of psych-zero
- Targeting psychological factors by GPs
- The story of psych-light
- The physiotherapy approach
- Findings: change from base line to 12 months
- Except for a few slight problems
- Physiotherapy has a significant impact
- Didn’t we know this already?
Topics Covered
- Psychological processes/factors associated with transition to chronic pain
- Depression in the context of pain
- Illness perception
- Fear avoidance
- Effective reassurance
- Psychological interventions for people with LBP
Links
Series:
Categories:
Therapeutic Areas:
Talk Citation
Pincus, T. (2015, July 30). Psychological treatment for people with musculoskeletal pain 1 [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved December 22, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.69645/XVSU1458.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
Financial Disclosures
- Prof. Tamar Pincus has not informed HSTalks of any commercial/financial relationship that it is appropriate to disclose.
Psychological treatment for people with musculoskeletal pain 1
Published on July 30, 2015
35 min
A selection of talks on Neurology
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hello. I'm Tamar Pincus.
I'm a professor of health
psychology at Royal
Holloway University of
London and I've been
studying pain for over 20 years.
Today, I'm going to be speaking
about the psychology of pain
as it relates to
musculoskeletal pain.
Most of the research will
be about low back pain
simply because this is the area
that has been covered in most depth,
but it does extend to other
conditions such as fibromyalgia,
sciatica, and others.
0:30
I'll be talking about
risk factors to moving
from a common complaint
like back pain
to chronic conditions
with a lot of disability.
I'm going to be covering some
of the interventions that
are currently offered and weighing
up the evidence for their efficacy.
And then I'm going to describe two
of the most common interventions,
CBT, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy,
and ACT, a less common one,
Acceptance and Commitment
Therapy, and I'm going
to explain how the two differ.
And I'm going to talk a little bit
towards the end about what we might
offer to which type of patient.
1:07
In order to find out what
psychological factors are
important in that move
towards chronicity,
we need to look at
prospective cohorts.
These are studies that measure a
whole load of factors at baseline
and then follow up people,
typically for 6 or 12 months, to try
and find out what
predicts poor outcome.
In order to do this, you have
to have some sort of idea
of what might predict bad outcome.
In other words, you need
to identify suspects.
You need to find good
measures of these suspects.
And we'll see later on
that some of the measures
are not as good as we
would like them to be.
You have to have a timeline.
You have to be sure that you measure
at baseline, in other words,
at early stages, typically less
than three weeks of back pain.
And you need to follow people
up typically at least twice
at early stages, such as 4 months
or 6 months, and then at 12 months.
The best studies
follow up for longer.
And we now have some
studies that follow
up patients for up to 10 years.
So we know quite a lot about
predictors of poor outcomes.