We noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Collaborators
- 1906: The start
- How to turn knowledge into a cure?
- Definition of oxidative stress
- Nucleic acid oxidation
- Sources of reactive oxygen
- Fenton reaction
- Redox-active iron accumulation
- Possible mechanism for oxidative damage
- Mitochondrial components are increased in AD
- While mitochondrial DNA is increased, mitochondria are not
- Mitochondria components are in autophagosomes
- Microtubules are reduced specifically in pyramidal neurons
- Mitochondrial fission/fusion proteins are changed in AD brains
- Decreased DLP1 levels are found in AD fibroblasts
- Altered mitochondrial morphology in AD fibroblasts
- Reduction of DLP1 levels in normal cell fibroblasts by iRNA
- Analysis of fibroblast derived neurons
- APP plays a role in mitochondrial network collapse
- Aβ overproduction underlies APP-induced mitochondrial abnormalities
- Mitochondria fusion is impaired by APP overexpression
- Mitochondria in the synapses are altered in AD
- Axonal and synaptic dysfunction in AD
- Correlation of mitochondrial changes with synaptic vesicle numbers and morphology
- Mitochondrial alterations in dendritic spines in AD
- Mitochondrial alterations in neuronal cell bodies in AD
- Mitochondrial changes in presynaptic, postsynaptic, and dendritic spines
- Conclusion
- Oxidative damage decreases with increased amyloid β
- Oxidative damage decreases with increased NFT
- Heme oxygenase 1
- Oxidative damage is highest in mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
- Oxidative damage decreases with disease progression in AD
- Familial AD cases
- Metal binding and oxidation of amyloid β within senile plaques
- Aβ blocks Cu-catalyzed lipid peroxidation
- Imaging of APC through polarized light microscopy and UHR FE-SEM
- Electron-dense particles in plaques
- Atomic resolution Cs-BF/HAADF-STEM imaging of magnetite nanoparticles
- Magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles within APC
- Advanced imaging & spectroscopy of biogenic metallic elements in APCs
- Mapping and magnetic characterization of Fe and Cu in amyloid plaques
- Magnetic state of the Fe aggregates within the APCs
- Metalloproteins in AD: Cu chelators promote disassembly of APCs
- Metalloproteins in AD: In vitro aggregation of synthetic Aβ with Cu (II)
- CID mass spectrometry of amyloid + Cu2+ binding and reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I)
- Fenton reaction: Role of amyloid ϐ in metal-mediated radical formation
- Are amyloid ϐ and τ protective responses against oxidative stressors in AD?
- Abnormalities in AD
- Is Alzheimer’s a homeostatic disease?
- Summary
- Financial disclosures
Topics Covered
- Oxidative stress
- Possible mechanism of oxidative damage
- Change in mitochondria in Alzheimer’s disease
- Amyloid precursor protein (APP) induced mitochondrial abnormalities
- Amyloid β and oxidative damage
- NFT and oxidative damage
- Metal binding and oxidation of amyloid β
- Metalloproteins in AD
- Role of amyloid β in metal-mediated radical formation
Talk Citation
Perry, G. (2026, June 30). Brain aging at a crossroads: where do we go from three decades of failed therapeutics? [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved July 1, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.69645/CXGV7691.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
- Published on June 30, 2026
Financial Disclosures
- Prof. George Perry is a consultant at MitoGenix Therapeutics.
Brain aging at a crossroads: where do we go from three decades of failed therapeutics?
Published on June 30, 2026
37 min
A selection of talks on Biochemistry
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Well, it's my honor to present
some of the insights we've
developed in Alzheimer's
disease over the last 40 years.
In particular, I'm
going to talk about
brain aging at a crossroads.
Where do we go from three
decades of failed therapeutics?
0:21
The work I'm going to present is
a collaboration
among many people.
I've listed many of them here,
both at the University
of Texas San Antonio,
where I now work.
Case Western Reserve University,
where I used to work,
as well as collaborator is
spread throughout the world,
and I'll mention some of them.
0:40
When you talk about
Alzheimer's disease,
one of the key issues
is where did it start.
I'll come back to
this later because
that description by
Alois Alzheimer's in
1906 still sets the
framework for now,
whether it's molecular biology,
genetics, protein
chemistry, radiomics.
Most people relate it
Alzheimer's disease is
a dementing loss of higher
cognitive function associated
with senile plaques of
amyloid and
neurofibrillary tangles
within neurons at risk of death.
Those three things
together form the basis
of Alzheimer's disease and
the basis of therapeutics.
1:27
But knowing that
Alzheimer's disease
is plaques and tangles,
and over 100 years of studies,
nearly 120 years of intensive
research, well funded,
how has that played out
in having a therapeutic?
Well, there's been
hundreds of thousands
of papers published in it.
There's been increased
funding from foundations.
But yet the only effective
therapeutics that are
approved have at best
addressed symptoms
and only work for a short time,
and the recently approved
monoclonal antibodies
don't even address
those symptoms.
They may slow the
course of the disease.
None of them reverse
the progression of
Alzheimer's disease.
With that in mind,
there's been a
99.6% failure of new
drug development
in Alzheimer's disease.
What I want to cover in the
rest of this talk is has
the focus been so long on
removing plaques and tangles,
in other words, removing
the changes of aging
that occur in the brain.
Now with the advanced monoclonal
antibodies that are effective in
removing amyloid for the brain,
and with marginal
clinical benefit at best.
Haven't we tested that the
answer is not so simple?
How do we go beyond this?
What we've done over the past
30-plus years is look at