Registration for a live webinar on 'Innovative Vaccines and Viral Pathogenesis: Insights from Recent Monkeypox (Mpox) Research' is now open.
See webinar detailsWe noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Inhibiting protein-protein interactions
- The druggable proteome
- Objectives (1)
- 5 propositions of the druggability of PPI targets
- Classification of PPI targets
- Small molecule inhibitors of PPI are hard to obtain
- PPI topology can vary widely
- Classification of PPI interfaces
- Druggability
- Druggability - definition
- The druggable proteome
- Fragment-based lead identification (1)
- Fragment-based lead identification (2)
- Empirical measures of druggability (1)
- Empirical measures of druggability (2)
- Factors affecting druggability
- Empirical measures of druggability (3)
- Computational assessment of PPI druggability (1)
- Computational assessment of PPI druggability (2)
- Evaluating PPI using FTMAP
- Example: Bcl-XL with ABT-737
- NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO)
- FTMap analysis of NEMO/IKKβ interface
- Nature of druggable sites in PPI
- Important lesson from fragment screening
- Druggability: overall conclusions
- Druggability: additional references
Topics Covered
- The druggable proteome
- Objectives
- Five propositions about the druggability of PPI targets
- Classification of PPI targets
- Why are small molecule inhibitors of PPI hard to obtain?
- PPI topology can vary widely
- Classification of PPI interfaces
- Druggability
- Fragment-based lead identification
- Empirical measures of druggability
- Factors affecting druggability
- Computational assessment of PPI druggability with FTMAP
- Evaluating PPI using FTMAP
- Nature of druggable sites in PPI
Talk Citation
Whitty, A. (2014, April 2). Inhibiting protein-protein interactions 1 [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.69645/FWUA2293.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
Financial Disclosures
- Dr. Adrian Whitty has not informed HSTalks of any commercial/financial relationship that it is appropriate to disclose.
Inhibiting protein-protein interactions 1
Published on April 2, 2014
41 min
A selection of talks on Biochemistry
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hello, my name is Adrian Whitty.
I'm an associate
professor of chemistry
in the Department of Chemistry
at Boston University.
But before I came to
BU five years ago,
I worked in industry in drug
discovery for about 15 years.
And so my research programs
at Boston University
are very much guided by
what I learned about how
to develop drugs in
an industrial setting.
What I want to talk about
today is the problem
of how to develop small molecule
inhibitors against a very
challenging class of
drug targets, called
protein-protein interactions.
0:34
So, I'm going to start by talking
about why one would even want
to inhibit protein-protein
interactions, in the first place.
0:43
On this slide, we see an analysis
that was published by Hopkins
and Groom, about 10 years ago,
in which they have analyzed all
of the proteins that make
up the human proteome,
and attempted to determine
what fraction of those fall
into the classes of protein
families that we know we are
able to discover small
molecule inhibitors for,
using contemporary drug
discovery technology.
And, what this slide shows is
that, it's estimated that about 10%
of the gene products
in the human genome
are biologically
compelling as drug targets.
They're involved in
diseases, and, therefore,
potentially drugs
targeting those proteins
could be beneficial
in disease states.
What Hopkins and Groom determined
is that, only a fraction
of those biologically
compelling drug targets
fall into families that we know
how to find inhibitors four.
And the majority parts of other
protein families, where there is
no current precedent for
identifying small molecule
inhibitors that can act as drugs.
And a large fraction of these
disease modifying genes,
that are not part of conventionally
druggable gene families,
are protein-protein interactions.