Registration for a live webinar on 'Innovative Vaccines and Viral Pathogenesis: Insights from Recent Monkeypox (Mpox) Research' is now open.
See webinar detailsWe noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Niche hypothesis
- Defining the bone marrow niche by function
- Niche targeted therapy
- Testing niche therapy in patients
- Bone marrow hematopoietic niche components
- Mesenchymal lineage in bone
- Mesenchymal cells of bone marrow stroma
- Promoters selectively active in the osteolineage
- Dicer1 deletion in mesenchymal cells
- Dicer1 deletion and peripheral blood cytopenia
- Dysplastic changes in blood
- Dysplastic changes in marrow
- Proliferation and apoptosis of marrow stem cells
- Effects on hematopoiesis of Dicer1 deletion
- Hematopoietic defects and the microenvironment
- Dicer1 deletion in mature osteoblasts
- Acute myeloid leukemia in Dicer1 deleted mice
- Molecular characterization of leukemic infiltrate
- Comparative gene expression analysis
- Shwachman-Diamond syndrome
- Sbds deletion in osteoprogenitor cells
- Mesenchymal lineage in bone and Dicer1 deletion
- Models of oncogenesis
- Microenvironment in standard cancer models
- Niche oncogenesis model
- Clinical settings where the model may apply
- Niche initiated dysplasia and neoplasia
- Characterizing niche mesenchymal cell dynamics
- Defining endosteal osteoblast lifetime
- Endosteal osteoblasts persist for 60 days
- Mesenchymal hierarchy in bone
- Osteoprogenitor pulse-chase
- Osteoprogenitor characteristics
- Mesenchymal hierarchy in bone and Mx-1
- Mx-1 induction can durably label osteolineage
- Mx-1 labels mesenchymal stem cells (MSC)
- MSC in vivo yield osteoblasts
- MSC in vivo do not yield chondrocytes
- Discriminating Mx1+ descendents in vivo
- Features of Mx-1 labeled cells
- Mx1+ MSC partially overlap with Nestin MSC (1)
- Mx1+ MSC partially overlap with Nestin MSC (2)
- Mx1+ MSC location
- Mx-1 labeled cells accumulate at sites of injury
- Mx-1 labeled cells engraft in matrigel
- Mx-1 labeled cells engraft when i.v. transplanted
- Mx1+ osteolineage progenitors: homing efficiency
- Mx1+ osteolineage progenitors serially transplant
- Conclusions: mesenchymal cell dynamics
- Niche mesenchymal cell dynamics conclusion
- Back to the niche oncogenesis model
- Conclusions: general
- Where to from here?
- Stroma
- Acknowledgements
Topics Covered
- The niche hypothesis
- The bone marrow niche
- Niche targeted therapy
- Mesenchymal cells
- Dicer1 deletion
- Schwachman-Diamond Syndrome
- The niche oncongeneis model and clinical applications
- Mesenchymal cell dynamics in the body
Talk Citation
Scadden, D.T. (2014, March 5). Niche oncogenesis [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved November 23, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.69645/MFJB7982.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
Financial Disclosures
- Prof. David T. Scadden has not informed HSTalks of any commercial/financial relationship that it is appropriate to disclose.
A selection of talks on Oncology
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
This is David Scadden.
I'm hematologist-oncologist at
Mass General Hospital, co-direct
the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, and
co-chair of the Department of Stem
Cell and Regenerative Biology
at Harvard University.
I'll be talking today
about niche oncogenesis,
the role of the hematopoietic
stem cell niche in particular,
and the development of malignancy.
0:21
The stem cell niche is a concept
first proposed by Ray Schofield
back in 1978 when he was
looking at blood stem cells.
At the time, the method by
which cells were analyzed
was called a colony-forming unit
of the spleen-- a so-called CFU-S.
And he recognized that stem cells
that he had been able to isolate
from the spleen in these colonies
seemed to behave less robustly
than stem cells derived
from the bone marrow.
And he proposed what now seems to
be an entirely obvious concept,
that where a stem cell resides
was in some ways playing
a critical role for its
function-- that the niche was
the basis for stem cells
having regulated self-renewal
and differentiation.
It was a competing hypothesis at the
time, which was that stem cells had
their own intrinsic engineering
and were capable of going
in the direction
that they knew best.
And it was Ray Schofield
who proposed that there was
this imposition of
information from the tissue
in which the stem cell resided.
It was a concept initially, and
one that really did not have much
in the way of experimental
definition until some years later
and mostly in invertebrates.
1:26
So the ability to then use
this information as a way
to try to understand
and experimentally
define how stem cells behaved
in vivo in mammalian systems
was first tested in the
hematopoietic system.
And their, my lab and other labs
were interested in just what
the relationship was between bone
marrow and the bone in which bone
marrow resides, and hypothesized
that there might be something
regulatory about bone that
governed stem cell function.
And so we set out to initially
just look at models where there was
genetic modification
of molecules that
could regulate cell
numbers in the bone.
And so in particular we used a
system that had been worked out
by Hank Kronenberg, where
he had a constitutively
active parathyroid hormone
receptor that was expressed
under the control of an
osteoblastic cell specific promoter.
Colleagues were, at the same
time, conducting a series
of conditional deletions of
the BMP receptor 1a, which
ended up having a very
similar phenotype.
And that phenotype was
basically to increase the number
of osteolineage cells and with that,
a concurrent increase in the number
of hematopoietic
stem and progenitors.
That led to the hypothesis that
these cells were central players
in being able to
regulate stem cells.
But it was subsequent work
that further defined that.
And there was the genetic
depletion of cells conducted
by two laboratories-- one of which
used a thymidine kinase being
expressed under control of
a bone specific promoter
and treating the cells
with a ganciclovir.
The other was to use conditional
deletion of osterix, which
prevented the development
of any osteoblastic cells.
And in both those cases,
there was a decrease
in the number of osteoblastic
cells and a decrease
in the number of stem cells.