We noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Immune suppression
- MDSC: Immune suppression
- Mice treated with MM EVs have increased levels of MDSC
- CD11b cells treated with MM EVs obtain a suppressive phenotype
- CD11b cells treated with MM EVs are more activated
- CD11b cells treated with MM EVs block T cell proliferation
- Monocytic MDSC differentiation induced by human myeloma-derived EVs
- Tumor associated macrophages (TAM) in immune suppression
- Low miR-16 (del13) in MM EVs polarizes blood monocytes (PB-M) into M2 TAMs
- Low miR-16 (del13) in MM EVs polarizes PB-M into functional M2 TAMs
- IL-32γ from myeloma EVs promotes PD-L1 expression in monocyte-induced macrophages
- IL-32γ treated macrophages inhibit T cell function
- IL-32γ treated macrophages inhibit T cell activation
- Hypoxia-driven MM sEVs promote M2 polarization via miR-1305
- Drug resistance
- Role for miR-146a in DR
- miR-146a mimics lead to increased MM viability and migration
- MM sEVs induce BMSC to cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) transition
- Role for miR-21/146a in drug resistance
- Overexpression of miR-27b-3p and miR-214-3p is involved in MM progression
- BMSC sEVs are picked up by MM cells
- BMSC sEVs induce migration and proliferation of MM cells
- BMSC induce resistance to bortezomib
- sEV cargo analysis identifies MCP-1 and SDF-1
- sEVs from BMSC to treat MM
- Role for IL6 and fibronectin in MM growth
- Role for miR-15a in BMSC EVs in MM suppression
- Role for miR-140–5p and miR-28–3p in DR (1)
- Role for miR-140–5p and miR-28–3p in DR (2)
- Therapeutic targeting of miR-140–5p and miR-28–3p
- Role for other miRs
- sEVs in drug resistance
- Bortezomib activates EV release by BMSC
- Sulfasalazine counteracts bortezomib
- Conclusions - Recap
- Take home message
- Acknowledgments
- Financial disclosures
Topics Covered
- Role of sEVs in immune suppression
- Hypoxia elevates the secretion level of sEVs from multiple myeloma cells
- Role of sEVs in drug resistance
- Role of miRs in drug resistance
- Role of different miRs in multiple myeloma
Talk Citation
Menu, E. (2025, September 30). Small extracellular vesicles in multiple myeloma development & drug resistance 2 [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved September 30, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.69645/WINI9345.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
- Published on September 30, 2025
Financial Disclosures
- There are no commercial/financial matters to disclose.
Small extracellular vesicles in multiple myeloma development & drug resistance 2
Published on September 30, 2025
26 min
A selection of talks on Oncology
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:04
We have now had angiogenesis
and osteolysis.
The next thing is the impact
on immune suppression.
Myeloma cells are
known to induce
immune suppression by either
enhancing the activity
of myeloid-derived
suppressor cells or by
enhancing the activity of
tumor-associated macrophages.
So the same questions
arise again.
Do EVs play a role?
What is the cargo, and does
hypoxia enhance this effect?
0:32
Just to give you
some background,
myeloid-derived
suppressor cells are
a heterogeneous
population of cells
originating from myeloid
progenitor cells
in the bone marrow, which
remain undifferentiated.
They accumulate in the
tumor microenvironment
and they suppress
the immune system
by activating T-regs,
or regulatory T-cells,
and by secreting
suppressive cytokines.
You can divide these
MDSCs into either
monocytic MDSCs or
granulocytic MDSCs.
The monocytic MDSCs are
the most suppressive.
MDSC activation is usually
triggered by
activation of STAT3.
Now these MDSCs
also play a role in
angiogenesis, metastasis
and stimulate myeloma
proliferation.
1:21
Just to show you how
myeloma increases
the number of MDSCs,
we compared healthy
mice to myeloma mice
and then we looked at the
number of CD11b cells.
This is what we did
in panel A, and then
we further divided the MDSCs
based on their phenotype.
We either have
the Ly6G^low
Ly6C^intermediate phenotype,
which represents the
monocytic MDSCs or we have
the Ly6G^high
Ly6C^intermediate phenotype
which represents the
granulocytic MDSCs.
You can see that in a
myeloma bone marrow
there is an increase in
the monocytic MDSCs,
so the most immune suppressive.
What we then did is like what
we did for the osteolysis.
We treated healthy mice
with just the EVs.
Not with the myeloma
cells, just the EVs.
Also here we saw an
increase in spleen size.
But when looking at CD11bs,
we saw an increase in both
bone marrow and spleen.
What was interesting
is when we looked at
the phenotype of these MDSCs,
we saw a similar phenotype
as when we would
have injected the mice with
myeloma cells themselves.
We saw an increase in the
Ly6G^low Ly6C^intermediate type
and a reduction in Ly6G^high
Ly6C^intermediate,
both in bone marrow and spleen.
Hide