Registration for a live webinar on 'Precision medicine treatment for anticancer drug resistance' is now open.
See webinar detailsWe noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- The first steps of pharmacovigilance
- A major challenge
- General premises in pharmacovigilance
- Working parameters of epidemiology
- Frequently repeated myths: case reports
- Frequently repeated myths: epidemiological studies
- Frequently repeated myths: databases
- Clinical trial methodology
- Definition of pharmacovigilance
- Sir Austin Bradford Hill: some ‘criteria’ for causality
- Aronson and Ferner guidelines
- References
- Casual types (1)
- Casual types (2)
- Some norms in science
- Some norms in science: the metaphysical norm
- Some norms in science: the causal norm
- Some norms in science: the norm of involvement
- Some norms in science: the tendency norm
- Some norms in science: the norm of deep understanding
- Some norms in science: the norm of negative results
- Some norms in science: the symptoms norm
- Some norms in science: the fallible and contextual norm
- Conclusion
- Thank you for your attention
Topics Covered
- Adverse drug reactions
- Causation
- Epidemiology
- WHO method
- Naranjo method
- Aronson and Ferner guidelines
- Scientific norms
Talk Citation
Edwards, I.R. (2023, August 31). Causation: the basis for pharmacovigilance [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved December 22, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.69645/QEAT9417.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
Financial Disclosures
- Prof. Ivor Ralph Edwards has not informed HSTalks of any commercial/financial relationship that it is appropriate to disclose.
A selection of talks on Pharmaceutical Sciences
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hello. I'm Ralph Edwards.
In the past, I have been a
professor in medicine for
many years I've
worked in the area
of adverse reactions to
medicine and toxicology.
Basically I'm a Clinical
toxicologists and have
worked with as I say
adverse drug reactions for
a long time as director of
the UMC which is a
collaborating center for WHO
and they manage the database of
adverse reactions,
global adverse reactions
for the whole world
really, which we
get adverse reactions from
about 130 countries
and for a long time
several decades and with
the results that we have
around coming up to
40 million adverse reactions
in the global database.
And its on that
background I have
based this talk starting
with the title,
which is causation. The
basis for pharmacovigilance.
1:23
That's because pharmacovigilance
starts with looking at each
individuals report for a
suspected adverse reaction
from a particular drug.
Now the problem is how do
we assess that report.
Is it worth starting a
clinical trial on that
adverse reaction or a group of
adverse reactions, just
where do we start?
Causation is the first thing.
The report could
be thought to be
an adverse reaction but it
could be another disease,
it could be a chance effect,
it could be anything.
I'm going to go
through this talking
about aspects of causation
and how the subtitle here
it's complex and
challenging subject.