Registration for a live webinar on 'Precision medicine treatment for anticancer drug resistance' is now open.
See webinar detailsWe noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Background
- Recommended readings
- Presentation outline
- The drug discovery process
- Growing problem with drug candidate failures
- The hit to lead process
- Hit validation and prioritization
- Sources of hits
- Hit selection process
- Readily calculated properties of hits
- In silico structural property "filters"
- Additional testing during the hits selection
- Some HTS hits examples (1)
- Fragment screening versus HTS
- Fragments identified versus protein targets
- Factors which influence hit quality
- Simple metrics for hit selection and prioritization
- Hit to lead process and strategies
- Hit to lead resourcing and technologies
- Technologies for hit to lead chemistry
- Purification and characterization
- Plate-based testing
- Typical workflow
- Factors which determine success of hit to lead
- Productivity and candidate quality improvement
- Fixation on target potency for SAR development
- Potency versus MW during lead optimization
- Influence of organizational culture on decisions
- Binding energy
- Structural influences on enthalpy and entropy
- Calculating binding energy
- Efficiency metrics useful in hit to lead
- How efficiency metrics are used
- Lipophilic efficiency terms (LLE and LELP)
- Examples from literature
- FMS kinase inhibitors as anti-inflammatory agents
- Metabolic “hot spot” identification
- In silico hit to lead (1)
- In silico hit to lead (2)
- Fragment based hit to lead (1)
- Fragment based hit to lead (2)
- Fragment based hit to lead (3)
- Fragment based hit to lead (4)
- Fragment based hit to lead (5)
- Conclusions
- Thank you
Topics Covered
- Defining hit-to-lead as the first phase of medicinal chemistry
- Selection of hits to begin a hit to lead campaign
- Overview of processes and technologies
- Risk factors that influence or determine success
Talk Citation
Rafferty, M. (2013, September 23). Hit to lead [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved December 22, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.69645/HNXQ5686.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
Financial Disclosures
- Dr. Michael Rafferty has not informed HSTalks of any commercial/financial relationship that it is appropriate to disclose.
A selection of talks on Pharmaceutical Sciences
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hello, my name is Mike Rafferty and the topic of my lecture is on early drug discovery activity known as Hit to Lead.
Before we get into the subject matter, I would like to briefly introduce myself.
0:14
I was trained as a medicinal chemist at the University of Kansas
and devoted essentially all of my professional career to pharmaceutical drug discovery and early development, mostly with large pharmaceutical companies.
A few years ago, I returned to Kansas where I now hold an adjunct professor appointment
in the department from which I graduated and
I teach drug discovery practices in the graduate program, including the present topic.
0:40
On this slide, you will find a list of publications that I considered to be important in putting together this lecture.
Most, if not all, of these references will be cited elsewhere in my presentation.
I can highly recommend any or all of these papers to anyone who is interested in drug discovery
and particularly in early-stage medicinal chemistry.
1:02
Here is what I'll be covering today.
After a brief review of the drug discovery process and a definition of what I mean by Hit to Lead,
I would then like to discuss the topic of hits,
where they come from, how one executes the all-important process of picking the best hit among the available candidates to start a medicinal chemistry campaign.
1:25
What is Hit to Lead?
Any drug discovery project must mature through at least three stages en route to the ultimate goal,
which is the nomination of a development candidate.
The Hit to Lead stage is the first point of engagement of chemistry with the project
and really represents a transition between what was a biology project that has now evolved into a chemistry challenge.
Just as a mutational defect in a monarch butterfly egg can compromise the whole process of maturation to a beautiful adult,
beginning any project with a poor-quality hit is a recipe for failure
by presenting often insurmountable problems for the chemist.
In my opinion, hit selection is probably the most important decision that will be made over the course of the entire discovery project,
and in a few minutes, we will talk about what goes into this decision.
I include a quote taken from a review by Michael Hahn at GSK,
which I think is a pretty good description of the ride
that most drug discovery projects take en route to a candidate nomination process, that can be both exhilarating and frustrating.