Registration for a live webinar on 'Precision medicine treatment for anticancer drug resistance' is now open.
See webinar detailsWe noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Screening for drug discovery (1)
- Screening for drug discovery (2)
- Virtual high-throughput screening
- Docking is a two-stage process
- Can docking/scoring software predict ligand binding affinity? (1)
- Can docking/scoring software predict ligand binding affinity? (2)
- Can docking/scoring software predict ligand binding affinity? (3)
- Consensus scoring
- Consensus docking?
- Can docking/scoring software predict ligand binding conformation?
- Drawbacks of consensus docking?
- Does consensus docking reject “good” compounds? (1)
- Does consensus docking reject “good” compounds? (2)
- Is consensus docking generally applicable?
- Effect of ligand flexibility on docking success rate
- Effect of ligand flexibility on consensus docking false positive rate
- Distribution of consensus docking statistics according to RMSD cut-off
- VALID@E: virtuAl LIgand discovery (1)
- Curation of a virtual chemical library
- EDULISS compound database
- Enriching EDULISS
- VALID@E: virtuAl LIgand discovery (2)
- Chromatin and cancer: stabilisers of the reptin-p53 complex
- Infectious disease: the matrix-associated astacin enzymes
- Inhibition of the p53-MDM2 protein-protein interface
- Conclusions (1)
- Conclusions (2)
- Acknowledgements
Topics Covered
- Virtual screening for drug discovery
- How docking programs work
- The concept of consensus scoring
- The concept of consensus docking
- The reliability of consensus docking
- Effect of ligand flexibility on docking success rate
- Virtual screening to identify lead-like molecules active against specific drug targets
Talk Citation
Houston, D. (2019, November 28). The utility of consensus approaches in virtual drug discovery [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved December 22, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.69645/SSCC5318.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
Financial Disclosures
- There are no commercial/financial matters to disclose.
A selection of talks on Pharmaceutical Sciences
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hi, my name is Dr. Douglass R. Houston.
I'm a senior lecturer at the University of Edinburgh.
My field is biochemistry and
specifically, drug discovery and
especially with a strong emphasis on computational drug discovery.
I'm going to be talking today about
the utility of consensus approaches in virtual drug discovery.
0:26
Before I get to the computational side of drug discovery and in particular,
the methodology of virtual screening,
I thought I'd just give a quick introduction into
the field of high-throughput screening as used
by both academia and
the pharmaceutical industry in the drug discovery field at the moment.
So, you've probably seen a diagram like this before.
It's essentially a pipeline detailing the different steps that you usually have to
go through when performing a drug discovery project and this is state of the art;
it's fairly standard now,
especially in the pharmaceutical industry.
So, you start on the left with target discovery.
So, that essentially is the stage zero where you're actually trying to find
a drug target that ought to be suitable for treating a particular disease.
So, for example, if your disease of interest is a type of cancer,
then an oncogene that encodes an oncoprotein might be a worthwhile target.
There are various computational approaches that can complement target discovery,
but that's not what I'm going to be talking about today.
I'm going to be talking about the computational or virtual versions
of the next step in the pipeline which is lead discovery.
But, this is the step that comes after you've
determined what you hope is a good drug target,
then you have to embark on a series of
experiments to try and find small molecules, hopefully,
drug-like compounds that modulate the activity of the target in
order to give you the effect that you're hoping
for in terms of treating a particular disease.
So, there are a few approaches to this lead discovery step.
A few experimental so-called wet-lab approaches,
we've got listed here:
fragment-based screening, focused libraries,
but the main one, the big one that's usually used,
especially in big pharma is the first one on the list-
high-throughput screening or HTS.