On Sunday, April 20th 2025, starting 8:30am GMT, there will be maintenance work that will involve the website being unavailable during parts of the day. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
We noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Dose-finding in oncology
- Dose lmiting toxicity (DLT)
- The maximum tolerable dose (MTD)
- Dose-toxicity relationship
- Starting dose and dose level selection
- Traditional or 3+3 design (1)
- Traditional or 3+3 design (2)
- Operating characteristics of 3+3 design
- Advantages and disadvantages of the 3+3 design
- A+B designs
- A+B designs: definition
- A+B designs: how to construct
- A+B designs: examples
- Trials with the MTD defined using toxicity grades
- Defining MTD using toxicity grades: example (1)
- Defining MTD using toxicity grades: example (2)
- Defining MTD using toxicity grades: example (3)
- A summary
- Escalation vs. fixed sample size designs for trials
- Fixed sample size vs. A+B designs: which to use?
- Fixed sample size designs
- Continual reassessment method (CRM)
- Cumulative cohort design (CCD) to find the MTD
- Components of the CRM and CCD
- Start-up rule (1)
- Start-up rule (2)
- Estimation of MTD after cumulative cohort design
- Design modifications for delayed toxicity outcomes
- Oncology trial with delayed toxicity outcomes (1)
- Oncology trial with delayed toxicity outcomes (2)
- Oncology trial with delayed toxicity outcomes (3)
- An example of a phase I trial with two agents
- An example of a phase I trial with ordered groups
- Single vs. separate trials
- Bayesian designs for 2 agents/ordered groups trial
- Isotonic designs for 2 agents/ordered group trials
- References (1)
- References (2)
- References (3)
- Additional reading
Topics Covered
- Maximum tolerable dose
- Standard or 3+3 design
- A+B designs
- Phase I trials that use toxicity grades
- Escalation versus fixed sample size designs for dose-finding trials
- Continual reassessment method
- Cumulative cohort design
- Start-up rule
- Design modifications for delayed toxicity outcomes
- Trials with two agents and ordered groups
Links
Series:
Categories:
Talk Citation
Ivanova, A. (2007, October 1). Dose-finding trials in oncology [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved April 15, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.69645/NZDG2139.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
Financial Disclosures
- Prof. Anastasia Ivanova has not informed HSTalks of any commercial/financial relationship that it is appropriate to disclose.