Share these talks and lectures with your colleagues
Invite colleaguesWe noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Talk outline
- Keys to global success
- Sources of competitive advantage
- Capabilities
- Dynamic capabilities
- Increasing difficulty and competitive advantage
- Leveraging capabilities: the RAT process
- Are the capabilities relevant?
- Are the capabilities appropriate?
- Leveraging capabilities: the CAT process
- Introducing CEMEX
- The RAT/CAT processes of CEMEX
- CEMEX stepping out
- CEMEX growing out
- CEMEX stepping up
- Which framework would have helped CEMEX?
- RATs and CATs multiply
- Relevance of the RAT/CAT model
- RAT/CAT in Aspan Aerogels
- RAT/CAT model in established firms
- Reflection
This material is restricted to subscribers.
Topics Covered
- Competing on capabilities
- Keys to global success
- Sources of competitive advantage – Capabilities
- Dynamic capabilities
- Does increasing difficulty increase competitive advantage?
- Leveraging capabilities: the RAT/CAT process
- Stepping out
- Growing up
- Stepping up
- Which framework would have avoided?
- How RATs and CATs multiply
- Relevance of the RAT/CAT model
- RAT/CAT model in established firms
- Reflection
Talk Citation
Lessard, D.R. (2014, April 1). Competing on capabilities in a global world: the RAT/CAT framework [Video file]. In The Business & Management Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved October 13, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.69645/HOYH1013.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
A selection of talks on Strategy
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
I'm Don Lessard.
I'm a professor at the MIT Sloan School.
Today I'm going to talk about a framework
for competing on capabilities in a global world.
What I call the RAT/CAT Framework.
0:12
There are really three parts to my presentation.
The first is a discussion of the sources of competitive advantage.
The second is really defining capabilities.
The third is laying out the RAT/CAT process
in an international context.
There I will use a specific example of CEMEX,
the Mexican cement corporations.
0:32
If you think about the keys to global success for a corporation,
there are really two.
The first, of course, is a ready market.
A great deal of the literature on international management
and international strategies is about
identifying large, rapidly growing markets.
The second part that is equally critical is a
relevant value proposition that is rooted in something
you can do that cannot be readily imitated by others.
I'm actually saying two things there.
One, a relevant value proposition,
something that creates value for the client
and something that is rooted in something you can do
that cannot be readily imitated,
so you can capture that value.
1:10
This is quite easy to understand if you think
of the sources of competitive advantage,
let's say, in big oil and gas,
you can think about companies having the advantaged assets.
You can think about companies having distinctive capabilities.
Typically, we think of large international oil companies,
IOCs, as combining advantaged assets,
big reserves, big fields, existing refineries,
pipeline facilities, et cetera,
and capabilities, the know-how regarding drilling,
know-how regarding reservoir management,
know-how regarding fuel supplies, et cetera.
But clearly, there are some firms that have
capabilities with no significant attached assets.
A very obvious example is Schlumberger.
Schlumberger does just fine.
It doesn't own any oil fields,
it doesn't own any reserves.
It makes a lot of money because it's a capabilities company.
Similarly, you could think about a company like First Reserve,
which is really just a private equity company
that owns oil and gas assets.
It does not have any distinctive management capabilities.
You could imagine competing only on capabilities.
You could imagine competing only on distinct advantaged assets.
But in general, in most industries, you will want to
compete on some combination of the two.
We can think about the advantaged assets, asset scale,
shared infrastructure, and intellectual property
as things we own.
We can think about capabilities as what we do.
Once you see it this way, it's common sense.
Competitive advantage comes from a combination
of things we own and things we do.