We noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
- Introduction
- Long term follow-up (LTFU) for gene therapy
- History of LTFU
- Health authority guidances: LTFU
- Call for approaches: Contract research organizations (1)
- Call for approaches: Contract research organizations (2)
- Gene therapy registries
- Registries and real-world evidence
- Academia
- What is a platform trial?
- Bespoke Gene Therapy Consortium (BGTC)
- Platform Vector Gene Therapy (PaVe-GT)
- Recent FDA initiatives support this approach to safety
- Why have a platform safety approach in LTFU?
- Benefits of platform trials for LTFU
- Comparing apples to apples
- Possible types of gene therapy LTFU platform studies
- Mock schedule of assessments
- How/why to pool AE rates across a class for GTx
- Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling (BHM)
- EXNEX (Exchangeable/Non-Exchangeable)
- EXNEX model structure (1)
- Adverse events with varying follow-up times
- EXNEX model structure (2)
- Fitting EXNEX models with the exnexstan R package
- EXNEX scenario: Binary outcome
- Financial disclosures & acknowledgements
Topics Covered
- Long-term follow-up of gene therapy (LTFU)
- History of LTFU
- Gene therapy registries
- Platform trials
- Bespoke Gene Therapy Consortium (BGTC)
- Mock schedule of assessments
- Bayesian hierarchical modelling
- EXNEX
Links
Series:
Categories:
External Links
- Slide 3: "Development of Gene Therapies Strategic, Scientific, Regulatory, and Access Considerations"
- Slide 3: Guidance for Industry: Gene Therapy Clinical Trials-Observing Subjects for Delayed Adverse Events; Availability
- Slide 5: Fortrea Therapeutics website
- Slide 6: Insight brief on "Long-term Follow-up for Gene Therapies – Innovative, Patient-centered Approaches"
- Slide 9: The Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard
- Slide 11: Twitter post for "AMP® BGTC Announcement for Rare Disease Selection Candidates"
- Slide 11: BGTC Goals
- Slide 11: Article on "Bespoke Gene Therapy Consortium – cooperation for rare disease therapies"
- Slide 13: USFDA "Action Plan for Rare Neurodegenerative Diseases including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis"
- Slide 25: Github files "maxdrohde/exnexstan"
Talk Citation
McIntosh, A. (2026, October 29). Long-term follow-up of gene therapy trial participants: practical and statistical considerations [Video file]. In The Biomedical & Life Sciences Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved October 29, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.69645/ADKD7757.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
- Published on October 29, 2026
Financial Disclosures
- Dr. McIntosh has the following relationships with commercial interests: Current/past employment – Pfizer, Inc.
Other Talks in the Series: Developing Gene Therapies
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hi, everyone. I'm
Avery McIntosh,
and I'm very glad to be
with you here today.
This talk is on
long-term follow-up
of gene therapy
trial participants:
practical and statistical
considerations.
0:15
Health authorities such as
the US Food and Drug
Administration,
European Medicines Agency and
Chinese regulatory
bodies require
subjects administered
gene therapy
to be followed for 5-15 years.
The reason for this is that
the long-term safety profile
of these products
is still evolving.
Sponsors such as
pharmaceutical companies
may also be interested in
quantifying the length
of durability since
gene therapies are one-time
administration drugs.
We also want to understand
the adverse event profile,
which could include
viral reactivation,
immune reactions, and
off-target effects.
This is really an
unprecedented length
of follow-up and
engagement with patients.
So there's a substantial
risk in this paradigm
to loss to follow-up
and potentially lack
of protocol adherence.
There are a number of
innovative solutions
to the complexity of
long-term follow-up
that have been proposed,
including platform trials
and master protocols,
which I'll talk about
a little bit here,
innovative statistical
techniques,
use of real-world data
and patient registries,
and decentralized
trial elements.
1:26
Now, we'll talk briefly
about the history of
long-term follow-up
for trial participants
administered a gene
therapy product.
The first published
human gene therapy trial
to introduce a therapeutic
gene was in the 1970s.
So quite a long time ago.
That same decade,
the US National
Institutes of Health
Recombinant Regulatory
Considerations in
the Development of
Gene Therapy Products
DNA Advisory Committee
was formed to reduce risks
associated with gene
transfer clinical protocols.
In 1988, the NIH RAC
officially approved the
first clinical protocol
to introduce a foreign
gene into humans.
By the 1990s, the US Food
and Drug Administration
and institutional review
boards assumed authority
to carry out
regulatory review of
gene therapy study protocols.
Prior to 2000,
the FDA required
long-term follow-up
only for clinical trial
participants who received
gene therapy products
containing retroviral vectors.
But a tragic event
with a subject
who ultimately died
after receiving
an investigational product
with an adenoviral vector
led regulators and industry
to reassess those guidelines.
After a series of
workshops in 2006,
the Food and Drug
Administration released
the final guidance on
observing subjects for
delayed adverse events,
and they recommended 15 years of
long-term follow-up
for participants
receiving investigational
gene therapy products,
of which the first five years,
subjects were to be
assessed through
clinical examination and for
10 more years through
questionnaires.
The guidance on this has
become a bit more specific
based on the mechanisms
of action of
the particular gene
therapy product.
Guidelines on the
long-term follow-up of