We noted you are experiencing viewing problems
-
Check with your IT department that JWPlatform, JWPlayer and Amazon AWS & CloudFront are not being blocked by your network. The relevant domains are *.jwplatform.com, *.jwpsrv.com, *.jwpcdn.com, jwpltx.com, jwpsrv.a.ssl.fastly.net, *.amazonaws.com and *.cloudfront.net. The relevant ports are 80 and 443.
-
Check the following talk links to see which ones work correctly:
Auto Mode
HTTP Progressive Download Send us your results from the above test links at access@hstalks.com and we will contact you with further advice on troubleshooting your viewing problems. -
No luck yet? More tips for troubleshooting viewing issues
-
Contact HST Support access@hstalks.com
-
Please review our troubleshooting guide for tips and advice on resolving your viewing problems.
-
For additional help, please don't hesitate to contact HST support access@hstalks.com
We hope you have enjoyed this limited-length demo
This is a limited length demo talk; you may
login or
review methods of
obtaining more access.
Printable Handouts
Navigable Slide Index
This material is restricted to subscribers.
Topics Covered
- Deliverables
- Mission command foundations
- Overcoming systemic challenges
- From generic to strategic risk management
- Leadership & risk
- Empowerment and followership
- Leadership restraint
- Followership implementation
Links
Categories:
External Links
- Slide 12: Resilience Under Military Operational Stress: Can Leaders Influence Hardiness?
- Slide 12: Military Leadership: A Context-Specific Review
- Slide 12: British Army Leadership Code
- Slide 12: Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
- Slide 12: Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior
- Slide 12: Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change
- Slide 11: Sascha Moses Carey on LinkedIn
Talk Citation
Moses Carey, S. (2026, February 26). Modelling military leadership practices in project-based civilian workforces: mission command, leadership & followership in practice [Video file]. In The Business & Management Collection, Henry Stewart Talks. Retrieved April 18, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.69645/GUXF8167.Export Citation (RIS)
Publication History
- Published on February 26, 2026
Extended-form Case Study
Modelling military leadership practices in project-based civilian workforces: mission command, leadership & followership in practice
Published on February 26, 2026
13 min
A selection of talks on Management, Leadership & Organisation
Transcript
Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hello. My name is
Sascha Moses Carey.
Today, I'll be presenting on
modeling military
leadership practices
in project-based
civilian workforces,
mission command, leadership, and
followership in
practice, a case study.
0:18
A little about me.
My name is Sascha Moses Carey.
My background started off in
Human Resources and
Organizational Leadership.
I then moved into
Health, Safety, Environment,
and Quality Management.
I have been in industries
such as defense,
rail, construction, and, most
recently, petrochemical.
I've recently completed my
Master's of Engineering
in Advanced Safety
Engineering and Management.
0:47
This case study is about
leading a turnaround project
in Guam that had been completely
shut down due to serious
safety failures.
When I arrived,
operations were frozen.
The workforce was
stuck in a state of
semi-organized chaos
and leadership
was leaning towards
micromanagement as a solution.
But that approach would
have crushed initiative
and reinforced a
very toxic culture.
Instead, I focused
on restoring trust
and creating a psychologically
safe environment.
I empowered leaders and
followers at every level
to take ownership,
make decisions, and act
within clear boundaries.
Using mission command
principles, we shifted from
top-down control to
decentralized leadership.
Supervisors became
trusted decision makers,
and followers were
encouraged to use
judgment and take
disciplined initiative.
This created a culture where
safety and mission success
were no longer competing
priorities; they were aligned.
The result was a project
that moved from paralysis
to safe, effective
execution on the ground.