Please wait while the transcript is being prepared...
0:00
Hello and welcome
to this session.
My name is Dr.
Tinkuma Edafioghor,
and I'm a senior lecturer in
human resource management
at the University of
the West of England.
In this session,
we are looking at
Netflix's Unlimited
Vacation Policy and
we'll be exploring the global
adaptation challenges
that they faced.
This case really shows
the tension between
big human resource
management innovations
and the need for
cultural adaptation.
0:32
Let's start with
some background.
Back in 2004, Netflix
made headlines for
introducing an unlimited
vacation policy.
The idea was simple but radical,
meaning it doesn't track
vacation days at all,
so employees could
take as much time off
as they wanted, as long
as the work is done.
It was a bold reflection of
Netflix's freedom and
responsibility culture,
and that's a culture that has
emphasized autonomy and trust.
In the US, it was
widely celebrated
as progressive and empowering.
But here is where
things got complicated.
1:12
When Netflix expanded globally,
the policy didn't land
the same way everywhere,
as cultural norms
around vacation
are very different
across the world.
In the US, time off is usually
seen as a personal decision,
but in some Asian countries,
people were hesitant to
take leave unless a
manager encouraged it.
They got worried
it might look like
a lack of loyalty or commitment.
Meanwhile, in parts of Europe,
strict labour laws and
expectations about vacation
clashed with the idea of
leaving it totally open.
So what was meant
to feel freeing
and actually created confusion,
reluctance, and even
stress in some cases.
Employees started asking,
who decides what's too much?
What if my manager says one
thing, but means another?
So Netflix had to respond.