Share these talks and lectures with your colleagues
Invite colleaguesUnderstanding the EU’s approach to harmonised regulatory reporting
Abstract
Increasing transparency in financial markets became one of the key objectives of broader regulatory reform around the globe following the 2008 financial crisis. For the EU, this objective is mostly dealt with within the Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR) and Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 on market in financial instruments (MiFIR) regulations, whereby the detailed obligations to report derivative contracts and transactions in a broad set of financial instruments are respectively enshrined. Reporting is often seen as a burden by firms. However, regulators across the EU have put significant efforts into harmonising reporting regimes to the extent it was feasible under the individual sectoral legislation, ie EMIR and MiFIR. This paper explores the commonalities and differences in the two reporting regimes by also providing insights into how the harmonisation of their technical implementation is being achieved.
The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.
Author's Biography
Olga Petrenko is the Market Integrity Senior Officer within the Markets Department at the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). She is involved in ESMA work on defining reporting requirements that stem from European regulatory regimes — EMIR, MiFID II/MiFIR, MAR and SFTR — in relation to various types of market data. More specifically, her current tasks focus ESMA implementing measures on trades, transactions, order book, instrument reference data and securities financing transactions reporting. Ms Petrenko joined the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR, the predecessor of ESMA) in March 2009 from the Lithuanian Securities Commission, where she held the position of Head of the Market Monitoring Division.