Skip to main content
Mobile
  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations
HS Talks HS Talks
Subjects  
Search
  • Notifications
    Notifications

    No current notifications.

  • User
    Welcome Guest
    You have Limited Access The Business & Management Collection
    Login
    Get Assistance
    Login
    Forgot your password?
    Login via your organisation
    Login via Organisation
    Get Assistance
Finance, Accounting & Economics
Global Business Management
Management, Leadership & Organisation
Marketing & Sales
Strategy
Technology & Operations
You currently don't have access to this journal. Request access now.
Practice paper

AI governance and algorithmic auditing in financial institutions: Lessons from Singapore

Nydia Remolina
Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 18 (3), 261-275 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.69554/RVPW6910

Abstract

This paper examines the role of algorithmic auditing as a mechanism for responsible AI development and deployment in the financial sector, with a particular focus on Singapore’s regulatory and institutional initiatives. Against the backdrop of fragmented global artificial intelligence (AI) governance frameworks, the study analyses how Singapore has developed operational tools — such as the Veritas Toolkit, AI Verify, Project Moonshot and Project Mindforge — that go beyond abstract ethical principles to provide measurable, use-case-specific standards for auditing AI systems. These initiatives contribute to standardising audit practices, enhancing transparency and bridging trust gaps between financial institutions, regulators and stakeholders. The paper finds that Singapore’s model is notable for its regulator-led, collaborative approach and its focus on sectoral applicability, particularly in high-risk areas such as credit scoring and fraud detection. It also identifies key limitations: the voluntary nature of these frameworks, the challenges of replicability in larger or more fragmented jurisdictions and the lack of universally accepted standards for algorithmic auditing. Moreover, the study highlights the need to broaden auditing efforts to include organisational and human factors, recognising that the use and interpretation of AI outputs are equally critical in managing risk. Ultimately, the paper offers insights into how Singapore’s experience can inform the development of scalable, enforceable and effective algorithmic auditing frameworks in global financial services. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Keywords: AI audits; artificial intelligence; FinTech; financial regulation; AI governance

The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.

Already a subscriber? Login or review other options.

Author's Biography

Nydia Remolina is Assistant Professor of Law at the Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University and Head of Industry Relations at the SMU Centre for Digital Law. She is also a member of the Swiss FinTech Innovation Lab at the University of Zurich. Her main areas of work and academic research include financial regulation, banking law and the intersection of law, technology and finance. Nydia has taught or delivered lectures at various institutions and programmes across the US, Asia, Europe and Latin America, including the Global Certificate Program jointly organised by Harvard Law School and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), and the course on open finance offered to financial regulators and policy makers by the Centre for Alternative Finance at the University of Cambridge. Prior to joining academia, Nydia practised law, serving as the Manager of Policy Affairs at one of the largest financial conglomerates in Latin America, as a Senior Adviser to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and working at Sullivan & Cromwell’s New York Office.

Citation

Remolina, Nydia (2025, June 1). AI governance and algorithmic auditing in financial institutions: Lessons from Singapore. In the Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Volume 18, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.69554/RVPW6910.

Options

  • Download PDF
  • Share this page
    Share This Article
    Messaging
    • Outlook
    • Gmail
    • Yahoo!
    • WhatsApp
    Social
    • Facebook
    • X
    • LinkedIn
    • VKontakte
    Permalink
cover image, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions
Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions
Volume 18 / Issue 3
© Henry Stewart
Publications LLP

The Business & Management Collection

  • ISSN: 2059-7177
  • Contact Us
  • Request Free Trial
  • Recommend to Your Librarian
  • Subscription Information
  • Match Content
  • Share This Collection
  • Embed Options
  • View Quick Start Guide
  • Accessibility

Categories

  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations

Librarian Information

  • General Information
  • MARC Records
  • Discovery Services
  • Onsite & Offsite Access
  • Federated (Shibboleth) Access
  • Usage Statistics
  • Promotional Materials
  • Testimonials

About Us

  • About HSTalks
  • Editors
  • Contact Information
  • About the Journals

HSTalks Home

Follow Us On:

HS Talks
  • Site Requirements
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
© Copyright Henry Stewart Talks Ltd

Personal Account Required

To use this function, you need to be signed in with a personal account.

If you already have a personal account, please login here.

Otherwise you may sign up now for a personal account.

HS Talks

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies, and similar tools, to improve the way this site functions, to track browsing patterns and enable marketing. For more information read our cookie policy and privacy policy.

Cookie Settings

How Cookies Are Used

Cookies are of the following types:

  • Essential to make the site function.
  • Used to analyse and improve visitor experience.

For more information see our Cookie Policy.

Some types of cookies can be disabled by you but doing so may adversely affect functionality. Please see below:

(always on)

If you block these cookies or set alerts in your browser parts of the website will not work.

Cookies that provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. If not allowed functionality may be impaired.

Cookies that count and track visits and on website activity enabling us to organise the website to optimise the experience of users. They may be blocked without immediate adverse effect.