Skip to main content
Mobile
  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations
HS Talks HS Talks
Subjects  
Search
  • Notifications
    Notifications

    No current notifications.

  • User
    Welcome Guest
    You have Limited Access The Business & Management Collection
    Login
    Get Assistance
    Login
    Forgot your password?
    Login via your organisation
    Login via Organisation
    Get Assistance
Finance, Accounting & Economics
Global Business Management
Management, Leadership & Organisation
Marketing & Sales
Strategy
Technology & Operations
You currently don't have access to this journal. Request access now.
Practice paper

Kaye v Lawrence revisited: The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 and the revolution of 1894

Mikael Rust
Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, 2 (3), 233-238 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.69554/OFNZ4249

Abstract

As the High Court itself anticipated, two-and-a-half years ago the judgment of Mr Justice Ramsey in Kaye v Lawrence [2010] EWHC 2678 (TCC) generated much interest among party wall surveyors, in particular the perceived extension of the availability of ‘security for expenses’ to an adjoining owner where a building owner is carrying out work entirely on his own land. The issue of security for expenses is to some extent merely the tip of the iceberg, being one logical outcome of a defining of the relationship of established common law rights with rights conferred by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The judgment is in fact a mine (some may say minefield) of long-awaited clarification on a number of matters that have sharply divided party wall surveyors for years. Mr Justice Ramsey's ruling gives clear guidance not only on the application of security for expenses but also rights of access onto an adjoining owner's land in order to carry out works on the building owner's land and the authority of surveyors to deal with insurance by the building owner and the design team. Uncertainty and differences of opinion between appointed surveyors on fundamental matters are unhelpful to parties caught up in the Act and can lead to significant unnecessary costs for the hapless building owner. Party wall surveyors of all persuasions would better serve the parties who appoint them and the intention of parliament by welcoming the clarity given by the few cases that reach the higher courts and then applying it with the practical even-handedness for which they are justly regarded by the judiciary.

Keywords: Kaye v Lawrence; Party Wall etc. Act; security for expenses; future damage; access under section 1; access under Party Wall Act; party wall insurance; conferred rights; common law rights

The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.

Already a subscriber? Login or review other options.

Author's Biography

Mikael Rust fell asleep reading Part VI of the London Building Acts (Amendment) Act 1939 on his first day at work as a graduate building surveyor in 1977. He has been dealing with party wall matters under the 1939 provisions and the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 ever since. A proud member of The Pyramus & Thisbe Club since 1978 he has also served on the Building Surveyors Divisional Council and various sub-committees at RICS before resigning in 2011. He now lives in Sweden but travels frequently to London where he is still very much involved in party wall matters and has been known to give the occasional talk on the subject.

Citation

Rust, Mikael (2013, October 1). `Kaye v Lawrence` revisited: The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 and the revolution of 1894. In the Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, Volume 2, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.69554/OFNZ4249.

Options

  • Download PDF
  • Share this page
    Share This Article
    Messaging
    • Outlook
    • Gmail
    • Yahoo!
    • WhatsApp
    Social
    • Facebook
    • X
    • LinkedIn
    • VKontakte
    Permalink
cover image, Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation
Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation
Volume 2 / Issue 3
© Henry Stewart
Publications LLP

The Business & Management Collection

  • ISSN: 2059-7177
  • Contact Us
  • Request Free Trial
  • Recommend to Your Librarian
  • Subscription Information
  • Match Content
  • Share This Collection
  • Embed Options
  • View Quick Start Guide
  • Accessibility

Categories

  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations

Librarian Information

  • General Information
  • MARC Records
  • Discovery Services
  • Onsite & Offsite Access
  • Federated (Shibboleth) Access
  • Usage Statistics
  • Promotional Materials
  • Testimonials

About Us

  • About HSTalks
  • Editors
  • Contact Information
  • About the Journals

HSTalks Home

Follow Us On:

HS Talks
  • Site Requirements
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
© Copyright Henry Stewart Talks Ltd

Personal Account Required

To use this function, you need to be signed in with a personal account.

If you already have a personal account, please login here.

Otherwise you may sign up now for a personal account.

HS Talks

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies, and similar tools, to improve the way this site functions, to track browsing patterns and enable marketing. For more information read our cookie policy and privacy policy.

Cookie Settings

How Cookies Are Used

Cookies are of the following types:

  • Essential to make the site function.
  • Used to analyse and improve visitor experience.

For more information see our Cookie Policy.

Some types of cookies can be disabled by you but doing so may adversely affect functionality. Please see below:

(always on)

If you block these cookies or set alerts in your browser parts of the website will not work.

Cookies that provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. If not allowed functionality may be impaired.

Cookies that count and track visits and on website activity enabling us to organise the website to optimise the experience of users. They may be blocked without immediate adverse effect.