Risks inherent within various models of decentralised crypto networks: A framework for an objective discussion about the level of decentralisation in crypto networks and risks to true decentralisation

Abstract

Decentralisation is not a binary concept, but a spectrum. This paper presents a starting point for an objective discussion about the levels and risks related to decentralisation across ecosystem, consensus protocol, tokens and network distribution attributes for the largest networks of today — such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon, Polkadot, Uniswap, Compound, AAVE, Curve, MakerDAO and Lido. The paper argues that it is imperative to identify, mitigate, monitor, measure and manage risks for a successful decentralised network to meet its business objectives, and emphasises that the true degree of decentralisation and risks in the network are shaped by the strengths and weaknesses of the design, and further affected by market forces creating a wide range of operational, technological, financial, strategic, legal and regulatory, reputational and business risks, among many.