Skip to main content
Mobile
  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations
HS Talks HS Talks
Subjects  
Search
  • Notifications
    Notifications

    No current notifications.

  • User
    Welcome Guest
    You have Limited Access The Business & Management Collection
    Login
    Get Assistance
    Login
    Forgot your password?
    Login via your organisation
    Login via Organisation
    Get Assistance
Finance, Accounting & Economics
Global Business Management
Management, Leadership & Organisation
Marketing & Sales
Strategy
Technology & Operations
You currently don't have access to this journal. Request access now.
Practice paper

Ain’t Nothin’ Goin’ On But The Rent? : or, How do you make a loss of rent claim work? Part 2

Richard Kay and Nic Taggart
Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, 8 (1), 75-93 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.69554/UECR9003

Abstract

Part two of this paper continues to analyse a landlord’s ability to include in a claim for damages at the end of a lease a sum representing the loss of the rent the landlord would otherwise have been able to receive from a new tenant, had the outgoing tenant not delivered up the premises out of the covenanted-for state and condition. The paper considers and contrasts the conceptual basis for such claims and discussing the conceptual issues arising from the special rules in respect of claims for damages for disrepair properly so-called, which flow from the case of Joyner v. Weeks and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, Section 18. The paper proposes a solution for the difficulties these special rules cause in respect of the general law of causation in damages claims. The paper examines both the legal and the valuation challenges in mounting such claims. It gives particular attention to the difficult issues arising with: the length of the period necessary to market the premises, even if they were in repair; the impact of a landlord being unwilling or unable to undertake repair works until the market has improved; and the position of a landlord who wishes to occupy the premises himself. The paper concludes with a practical, step-by-step procedure for the calculation of such claims (which is also conveniently summarised in a flowchart). This is intended to guide practitioners through the process of making such a claim as simply as possible. Part one of this paper was published in Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation Volume 7 Number 4.

Keywords: terminal dilapidations; damages; loss of rent

The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.

Already a subscriber? Login or review other options.

Author's Biography

Richard Kay FRICS qualified in 1996, after obtaining an honours degree in urban land economics. He is senior partner at Beckett and Kay, a firm he founded with Peter Beckett in 2002. Peter is now a consultant and Henrietta Hammonds joined as a partner in 2016. The firm deals with both commercial and residential property, specialising in landlord and tenant matters, with particular expertise in the fields of valuation in dilapidations cases, leasehold enfranchisement, and valuations in restrictive covenant cases (‘s84’). The firm is based in the City of London but acts throughout England and Wales and has recently been involved in several valuation cases in Scotland. Richard is a Fellow of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and an RICS Registered Valuer. He is a member of the RICS Dilapidations Forum Steering Group (2008–12 and re-elected in 2018). As a trainee surveyor, he had involvement in the leading case on dilapidations, Shortlands Investments v Cargill, and more recently appeared at the Central London County Court as the tenant’s valuer in Anstruther v Vidas, a case touching on multiple issues concerning valuation in dilapidations claims. Richard also has long-standing experience in leasehold enfranchisement matters, including many appearances as an expert witness at the First-tier Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (formerly the LVT) for landlords, intermediate landlords and tenants. He appeared as an expert witness at the Lands Tribunal (now the Upper Tribunal [Lands Chamber]) in the Nailrile appeals on behalf of the tenants and intermediate landlord of 62 Cadogan Square, London SW1.

Nic Taggart has been consistently rated as a ‘top-tier’ junior for real estate litigation by both Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 for over 12 years and was Chambers and Partners’ Real Estate Litigation Junior of the Year 2011. He deals with all aspects of commercial real estate work, with an emphasis on work involving valuation disputes, such as dilapidations, lease renewals under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 and rent reviews. Being at heart an anarchist, he is also a dab hand at ‘Ground (f)’ claims under the 1954 Act, although he feels more comfortable talking about demolition than reconstruction. Nic is often involved in the sort of cases no one else in Chambers really wants to do, involving recherché matters such as the Electronic Communications Code, manorial and riparian rights and drainage. Nic is an editor of Hill & Redman’s Law of Landlord and Tenant, on the editorial board of The Conveyancer, a co-opted member of The Law Society’s Conveyancing and Land Law Committee, an equally co-opted member of the RICS Dilapidations Forum Steering Group, a contributor to Bullen, Leake & Jacob’s Precedents of Pleadings and a sometime visiting lecturer in property law at both the London School of Economics and the University of Oxford.

Citation

Kay, Richard and Taggart, Nic (2019, June 1). Ain’t Nothin’ Goin’ On But The Rent? : or, How do you make a loss of rent claim work? Part 2. In the Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, Volume 8, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.69554/UECR9003.

Options

  • Download PDF
  • Share this page
    Share This Article
    Messaging
    • Outlook
    • Gmail
    • Yahoo!
    • WhatsApp
    Social
    • Facebook
    • X
    • LinkedIn
    • VKontakte
    Permalink
cover image, Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation
Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation
Volume 8 / Issue 1
© Henry Stewart
Publications LLP

The Business & Management Collection

  • ISSN: 2059-7177
  • Contact Us
  • Request Free Trial
  • Recommend to Your Librarian
  • Subscription Information
  • Match Content
  • Share This Collection
  • Embed Options
  • View Quick Start Guide
  • Accessibility

Categories

  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations

Librarian Information

  • General Information
  • MARC Records
  • Discovery Services
  • Onsite & Offsite Access
  • Federated (Shibboleth) Access
  • Usage Statistics
  • Promotional Materials
  • Testimonials

About Us

  • About HSTalks
  • Editors
  • Contact Information
  • About the Journals

HSTalks Home

Follow Us On:

HS Talks
  • Site Requirements
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
© Copyright Henry Stewart Talks Ltd

Personal Account Required

To use this function, you need to be signed in with a personal account.

If you already have a personal account, please login here.

Otherwise you may sign up now for a personal account.

HS Talks

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies, and similar tools, to improve the way this site functions, to track browsing patterns and enable marketing. For more information read our cookie policy and privacy policy.

Cookie Settings

How Cookies Are Used

Cookies are of the following types:

  • Essential to make the site function.
  • Used to analyse and improve visitor experience.

For more information see our Cookie Policy.

Some types of cookies can be disabled by you but doing so may adversely affect functionality. Please see below:

(always on)

If you block these cookies or set alerts in your browser parts of the website will not work.

Cookies that provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. If not allowed functionality may be impaired.

Cookies that count and track visits and on website activity enabling us to organise the website to optimise the experience of users. They may be blocked without immediate adverse effect.