Share these talks and lectures with your colleagues
Invite colleaguesPractice paper
Jay-Z thrusts SEC subpoena enforcement into the spotlight: A look at recent trends and considerations
Journal of Financial Compliance,
2
(3),
284-292
(2019)
Abstract
The staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Enforcement use subpoena enforcement actions to obtain the information they deem necessary to an investigation when the recipient of an investigative subpoena fails to respond. The SEC announces such actions in order to deter others who might consider non-compliance as well as to show the public that the SEC is vigilant about asserting its authority. But the SEC does not always enforce subpoenas in instances of non-compliance and when it does, it does not always announce subpoena enforcement actions; indeed, in the past it rarely did. A good example of these actions is in the SEC’s public announcement in 2018 of a subpoena enforcement action against the rapper Jay-Z, which appears to have obtained the desired effect of compliance with the subpoena, as well as, given the fame of the subject, giving broad coverage of the SEC’s willingness to enforce its subpoenas. This paper explores recent trends in the issuance and enforcement of SEC subpoenas, including the increase in enforcement action publicity, and discusses considerations when choosing between complying with a subpoena or, alternatively, risking a subpoena enforcement action.
Keywords: securities; regulation; litigation; subpoena; investigation; enforcement
The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.
Author's Biography
Daniel Nathan is a partner in the Washington, DC office of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, where he is a member of the White Collar, Investigations, Securities Litigation & Compliance practice group. He was previously a senior official with the enforcement departments of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. In his current practice, he provides representation before those regulators, private litigation defence, and regulatory and compliance counselling.
Nicole Wredberg is an associate in Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP’s White Collar, Investigations, Securities Litigation & Compliance group in the firm’s San Francisco office. Her practice focuses on government investigations, securities litigation and complex business litigation.
William Heidepriem-Baird is a third year law student at the University of Virginia School of Law where he serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the Virginia Journal of Criminal Law. In Fall 2019 he will begin working as a litigation associate in the Washington, DC office of Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe, where he worked as a summer associate the previous year.
