Skip to main content
Mobile
  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations
HS Talks HS Talks
Subjects  
Search
  • Notifications
    Notifications

    No current notifications.

  • User
    Welcome Guest
    You have Limited Access The Business & Management Collection
    Login
    Get Assistance
    Login
    Forgot your password?
    Login via your organisation
    Login via Organisation
    Get Assistance
Finance, Accounting & Economics
Global Business Management
Management, Leadership & Organisation
Marketing & Sales
Strategy
Technology & Operations
Case study

Comparative analysis of multiple-guarantor agreements

Issouf Soumaré, Fabien Youbissi and Michel Gendron
Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 4 (2), 146-161 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.69554/RGST4145

Abstract

Co-guarantor agreements are compared with independent-guarantor agreements. With co-guarantor agreements, the guarantor is more strongly affected by changes to project assets or to guarantor assets. These agreements seem more advantageous to creditors because of the diversification effect, ie each guarantor must consider not only its own ability to repay the loan but also the repayment capacity of other guarantors and the borrower. With both types of agreement, loan pricing is mainly determined by the risk inherent in project assets or guarantor assets, much more so than by similarity in asset characteristics among guarantors or by similarity in asset characteristics between guarantors and projects.

Keywords: co-guarantee; credit insurance; loan guarantee; project finance; G13; G22

The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.

Already a subscriber? Login or review other options.

Author's Biography

Issouf Soumaré is Associate Professor of Finance and Managing Director of the Laboratory for Financial Engineering at Laval University, Canada. His research and teaching interests include risk management, financial engineering and numerical methods in finance. He co-authored the book ‘Stochastic Simulation and Applications in Finance with Matlab Programs’ (Wiley). His theoretical and applied financial economic works have been published in leading international economics and finance journals. Issouf holds a PhD in business administration in finance from the University of British Columbia (Canada) and is also a certified Professional Risk Manager and Financial Risk Manager.

Fabien Youbissi held his first banking position as a manager in the Analytics and Structured Transaction group at Scotia Bank from November 2006 to June 2007. He subsequently joined the newly created Hedge Funds Analytics group of the same company and was promoted to Senior Manager in May 2009. In September 2010, Fabien joined the Capital Markets division of BMO Financial Group as Vice President of Structured Finance Risk Management, looking after prime brokerage portfolios. He has a PhD in applied mathematics and a master’s in financial engineering (both from Laval University, 2006).

Michel Gendron is head of the Department of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate at Laval University. He is also the founder and director of FSA Trading Rooms. He obtained a PhD in finance from the University of British Columbia and his work has been published in many finance and insurance journals, including The Journal of Finance, European Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Research, The Journal of Fixed Income, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Geneva Papers in Risk and Insurance Theory and The Journal of Risk Finance.

Citation

Soumaré, Issouf, Youbissi, Fabien and Gendron, Michel (2011, March 1). Comparative analysis of multiple-guarantor agreements. In the Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Volume 4, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.69554/RGST4145.

Options

  • Download PDF
  • Share this page
    Share This Article
    Messaging
    • Outlook
    • Gmail
    • Yahoo!
    • WhatsApp
    Social
    • Facebook
    • X
    • LinkedIn
    • VKontakte
    Permalink
cover image, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions
Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions
Volume 4 / Issue 2
© Henry Stewart
Publications LLP

The Business & Management Collection

  • ISSN: 2059-7177
  • Contact Us
  • Request Free Trial
  • Recommend to Your Librarian
  • Subscription Information
  • Match Content
  • Share This Collection
  • Embed Options
  • View Quick Start Guide
  • Accessibility

Categories

  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations

Librarian Information

  • General Information
  • MARC Records
  • Discovery Services
  • Onsite & Offsite Access
  • Federated (Shibboleth) Access
  • Usage Statistics
  • Promotional Materials
  • Testimonials

About Us

  • About HSTalks
  • Editors
  • Contact Information
  • About the Journals

HSTalks Home

Follow Us On:

HS Talks
  • Site Requirements
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
© Copyright Henry Stewart Talks Ltd

Personal Account Required

To use this function, you need to be signed in with a personal account.

If you already have a personal account, please login here.

Otherwise you may sign up now for a personal account.

HS Talks

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies, and similar tools, to improve the way this site functions, to track browsing patterns and enable marketing. For more information read our cookie policy and privacy policy.

Cookie Settings

How Cookies Are Used

Cookies are of the following types:

  • Essential to make the site function.
  • Used to analyse and improve visitor experience.

For more information see our Cookie Policy.

Some types of cookies can be disabled by you but doing so may adversely affect functionality. Please see below:

(always on)

If you block these cookies or set alerts in your browser parts of the website will not work.

Cookies that provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. If not allowed functionality may be impaired.

Cookies that count and track visits and on website activity enabling us to organise the website to optimise the experience of users. They may be blocked without immediate adverse effect.