Skip to main content
Mobile
  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations
HS Talks HS Talks
Subjects  
Search
  • Notifications
    Notifications

    No current notifications.

  • User
    Welcome Guest
    You have Limited Access The Business & Management Collection
    Login
    Get Assistance
    Login
    Forgot your password?
    Login via your organisation
    Login via Organisation
    Get Assistance
Finance, Accounting & Economics
Global Business Management
Management, Leadership & Organisation
Marketing & Sales
Strategy
Technology & Operations
Practice paper

Daylight and density: The application of the Housing SPG policy on daylight

Simone Pagani
Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, 7 (2), 132-149 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.69554/PJOH4690

Abstract

In May 2017, GIA published a report in collaboration with London First titled ‘Guiding Light, Unlocking London’s Residential Density’.1 The report recommended that the new London Plan (LP), then about to be published in draft, consider an evidence-based and contextually-founded approach to the delivery of greater urban density, where this can be supported. Among other density metrics proposed in the paper, a new approach to daylight and sunlight guidance for dense urban environments was advocated as one of the key components to achieving a significant increase in new housing and maintaining good quality amenity. This approach followed on from the work GIA completed in relation to the current Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG 2016),2 where a contextual approach to daylight assessments was formalised into policy for the first time. This paper discusses the application of the Housing SPG policy on daylight through the specific example of the Whitechapel Estate consent, which was granted following a planning appeal. The Whitechapel Estate appeal was the first to consider an example of applied contextual density study, which was adopted in response to a planning refusal on the grounds that the proposal: ‘would cause harm to the amenity of occupiers of neighbouring properties with undue sense of enclosure and unacceptable losses of daylight and sunlight’.

Keywords: daylight; sunlight; contextual; Whitechapel; Housing SPG; Rights of Light; London Plan

The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.

Already a subscriber? Login or review other options.

Author's Biography

Simone Pagani MSc MSLL, joined GIA in 2007 and established the Daylight+Solar Design (D+SD) Department with the aim of helping architects and developers optimise the use of daylight and sunlight amenity in the built environment. D+SD is the largest dedicated daylight design team in the UK, providing specialist advice, innovative and bespoke analyses such as solar glare, light pollution and solar convergence. Simone has worked on key regeneration projects including Battersea Power Station, as well as several iconic towers in London such as the Walkie-Talkie, 22 Bishopsgate and 100 Leadenhall. Most recently, Simone led the research resulting in a publication entitled ‘Guiding Light, Unlocking London’s Residential Density’, in collaboration with London First, which explores new ways of achieving density in the urban environment. The research work influenced the Housing SPG and London Plan, and was successfully applied in the Whitechapel Estate Appeal presented in this paper.

Citation

Pagani, Simone (2018, September 1). Daylight and density: The application of the Housing SPG policy on daylight. In the Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, Volume 7, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.69554/PJOH4690.

Options

  • Download PDF
  • Share this page
    Share This Article
    Messaging
    • Outlook
    • Gmail
    • Yahoo!
    • WhatsApp
    Social
    • Facebook
    • X
    • LinkedIn
    • VKontakte
    Permalink
cover image, Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation
Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation
Volume 7 / Issue 2
© Henry Stewart
Publications LLP

The Business & Management Collection

  • ISSN: 2059-7177
  • Contact Us
  • Request Free Trial
  • Recommend to Your Librarian
  • Subscription Information
  • Match Content
  • Share This Collection
  • Embed Options
  • View Quick Start Guide
  • Accessibility

Categories

  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations

Librarian Information

  • General Information
  • MARC Records
  • Discovery Services
  • Onsite & Offsite Access
  • Federated (Shibboleth) Access
  • Usage Statistics
  • Promotional Materials
  • Testimonials

About Us

  • About HSTalks
  • Editors
  • Contact Information
  • About the Journals

HSTalks Home

Follow Us On:

HS Talks
  • Site Requirements
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
© Copyright Henry Stewart Talks Ltd

Personal Account Required

To use this function, you need to be signed in with a personal account.

If you already have a personal account, please login here.

Otherwise you may sign up now for a personal account.

HS Talks

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies, and similar tools, to improve the way this site functions, to track browsing patterns and enable marketing. For more information read our cookie policy and privacy policy.

Cookie Settings

How Cookies Are Used

Cookies are of the following types:

  • Essential to make the site function.
  • Used to analyse and improve visitor experience.

For more information see our Cookie Policy.

Some types of cookies can be disabled by you but doing so may adversely affect functionality. Please see below:

(always on)

If you block these cookies or set alerts in your browser parts of the website will not work.

Cookies that provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. If not allowed functionality may be impaired.

Cookies that count and track visits and on website activity enabling us to organise the website to optimise the experience of users. They may be blocked without immediate adverse effect.