Skip to main content
Mobile
  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations
HS Talks HS Talks
Subjects  
Search
  • Notifications
    Notifications

    No current notifications.

  • User
    Welcome Guest
    You have Limited Access The Business & Management Collection
    Login
    Get Assistance
    Login
    Forgot your password?
    Login via your organisation
    Login via Organisation
    Get Assistance
Finance, Accounting & Economics
Global Business Management
Management, Leadership & Organisation
Marketing & Sales
Strategy
Technology & Operations
You currently don't have access to this journal. Request access now.
Practice paper

An alternative to SMA: Using through the cycle loss data to propose a ‘hourglass’ solution

Michael Grimwade
Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 11 (4), 361-380 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.69554/NNTP7728

Abstract

The losses suffered across the industry in the aftermath of the financial crisis significantly undermined the credibility of operational risk modelling techniques and have led to the Basel Committee proposing the removal of Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) models from Pillar 1 capital. This paper analyses systematically financial and loss information for the Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) that are in the public domain across economic cycles to answer three fundamental questions:
(1) Why have operational risks proved so difficult to model?
The analysis of historical loss data illustrates that some of the most significant operational risks are sensitive to economic cycles, and an explanation is provided for this observation that utilises real options theory. Further analysis of the impacts of the financial crisis demonstrates that losses across the three main risk types came in overlapping waves; that is, market risk losses peaked first, then credit risk and finally operational risk. The paper quantifies the varying lags between discovery and settlement of different categories of operational risks, and observes that a firm’s current loss profile may be more reflective of its previous cultures and controls. All of these characteristics of operational risk make it a difficult risk to model effectively.
(2) Will Basel III’s new Standardised Approach (aka SMA) be any better than AMA?
The paper identifies that AMA models were further undermined by an initial miscalibration of operational risk capital by the Basel Committee; the lack of standardisation in modelling techniques across the industry and the belief that operational risk could be modelled using insurance industry techniques. In striving for a methodology that delivers both greater simplicity and consistency for Pillar 1 capital, the paper argues that Basel III’s Standardised Approach does not address the various characteristics of operational risk described in the first section of the paper. Analysis is also provided, which calls into doubt the assumed relationship between size and a firm’s operational risk profile.
(3) How could operational risk be modelled more effectively?
Finally, the paper proposes an end to one size fits all approaches to modelling operational risk and instead splits the risk into three categories: (1) idiosyncratic and sudden losses; (2) idiosyncratic and lagging losses; and (3) cyclical and lagging losses. For each of these three categories modelling approaches are proposed that are appropriate for their specific characteristics. For idiosyncratic and sudden losses, the existing and proposed regulatory approaches are reasonable. While for idiosyncratic and lagging losses firms should primarily establish accounting provisions rather than set aside capital, reflecting the extended period between discovery and settlement. Finally, for cyclical and lagging losses Pillar 2B capital should be allocated due to the correlation of these risks with market and credit risk losses. The paper proposes techniques for conducting stress testing that are consistent with a real option theory explanation of correlation.

Keywords: operational risk management; modelling techniques; Basel III; Standardised Measurement Approach; financial crisis; real option theory

The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.

Already a subscriber? Login or review other options.

Author's Biography

Michael Grimwade has worked in operational risk management for over 20 years. He is Head of Operational Risk at ICBC Standard Bank and until recently he was a board member of the Institute of Operational Risk. In 2014, he received an award from the Institute of Operational Risk (IOR) for his ‘Contribution to the discipline of Operational Risk Management’ and in 2016, RiskBooks published his book entitled, Managing Operational Risk: New Insights & Lessons Learnt.

Citation

Grimwade, Michael (2018, September 1). An alternative to SMA: Using through the cycle loss data to propose a ‘hourglass’ solution. In the Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Volume 11, Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.69554/NNTP7728.

Options

  • Download PDF
  • Share this page
    Share This Article
    Messaging
    • Outlook
    • Gmail
    • Yahoo!
    • WhatsApp
    Social
    • Facebook
    • X
    • LinkedIn
    • VKontakte
    Permalink
cover image, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions
Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions
Volume 11 / Issue 4
© Henry Stewart
Publications LLP

The Business & Management Collection

  • ISSN: 2059-7177
  • Contact Us
  • Request Free Trial
  • Recommend to Your Librarian
  • Subscription Information
  • Match Content
  • Share This Collection
  • Embed Options
  • View Quick Start Guide
  • Accessibility

Categories

  • Finance, Accounting & Economics
  • Global Business Management
  • Management, Leadership & Organisation
  • Marketing & Sales
  • Strategy
  • Technology & Operations

Librarian Information

  • General Information
  • MARC Records
  • Discovery Services
  • Onsite & Offsite Access
  • Federated (Shibboleth) Access
  • Usage Statistics
  • Promotional Materials
  • Testimonials

About Us

  • About HSTalks
  • Editors
  • Contact Information
  • About the Journals

HSTalks Home

Follow Us On:

HS Talks
  • Site Requirements
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap
© Copyright Henry Stewart Talks Ltd

Personal Account Required

To use this function, you need to be signed in with a personal account.

If you already have a personal account, please login here.

Otherwise you may sign up now for a personal account.

HS Talks

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies, and similar tools, to improve the way this site functions, to track browsing patterns and enable marketing. For more information read our cookie policy and privacy policy.

Cookie Settings

How Cookies Are Used

Cookies are of the following types:

  • Essential to make the site function.
  • Used to analyse and improve visitor experience.

For more information see our Cookie Policy.

Some types of cookies can be disabled by you but doing so may adversely affect functionality. Please see below:

(always on)

If you block these cookies or set alerts in your browser parts of the website will not work.

Cookies that provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. If not allowed functionality may be impaired.

Cookies that count and track visits and on website activity enabling us to organise the website to optimise the experience of users. They may be blocked without immediate adverse effect.