Share these talks and lectures with your colleagues
Invite colleaguesFixing prompt corrective action
Abstract
Prompt corrective action (PCA) requires regulators to sanction banks before they become insolvent and to resolve institutions within 90 days of reaching critically undercapitalised status. Forensic studies of the financial crisis conclude that the PCA process not only failed to rehabilitate troubled banks, it also produced a higher average loss rate when banks failed compared to the pre-PCA period. A promising approach for reforming PCA is to replace capital adequacy ratios with a bank’s nonperforming asset coverage ratio. This simple revision will identify weak institutions long before they fail and could significantly reduce deposit insurance fund losses. The nonperforming asset coverage ratio is also a transparent and useful early warning statistic that depositors and bank-dependent businesses can use to monitor the financial strength of bank counterparties.
The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.
Author's Biography
Paul Kupiec is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). His research focuses on the management and regulation of financial markets and institutions including developments in bank risk measurement and systemic risk modeling, regulatory policies such as Basel III, and the impact of Dodd-Frank post financial crisis regulatory reforms.
Citation
Kupiec, Paul (2016, June 1). Fixing prompt corrective action. In the Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Volume 9, Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.69554/LDTH4807.Publications LLP