Effectiveness of fraud interventions : Combining systemic and individual interventions
Abstract
This paper outlines a systemic approach to combating payment transaction fraud. Fraud is a significant societal problem that can be understood as a complex system. Interventions within such systems can be categorised as S-frame (system change) or I-frame (individual or behavioural change). The paper argues that both forms of intervention are necessary, supported by strong feedback loops between the two. Three case studies are presented. First, the S-frame intervention of daily payment limits is examined, with a focus on its impact on bank impersonation fraud. Secondly, the S-frame intervention of payee verification is discussed, including results from its early implementation in the Dutch market in 2017. Finally, I-frame interventions through targeted awareness campaigns are illustrated using the example of the ‘TikTok job scam’. The paper concludes with the following recommendations: (1) regulators should enable payment service providers (PSPs) to apply robust S-frame interventions; (2) PSPs should adopt a systemic perspective, integrating S-frame and I-frame approaches; and (3) system actors should be permitted to share data to strengthen and sustain feedback loops. This article is also included in the Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at http:// hstalks/business.
The full article is available to subscribers to the journal.
Author's Biography
Martijn De Ruijter is Head of SEPA Products and Payment Transactions Fraud at Rabobank. He is responsible for product management and delivery related to SEPA Payment Products and a number of related applications. He is also responsible for fraud prevention, including the coordination of relevant policies, awareness, prevention, detection, case handling and compensation activities. Martijn holds master degrees in finance and marketing.